G D Goenka International School, like any other educational criterion, evaluation must have also progressed to have taken a modern shape. Not that it should be phased out, however the present times require a more futuristic technique and that is where the idea of collaborative evaluation holds importance. Hence, if this reason is the driving aspect of collective learning in the Best School in Haryana, it only serves that the assessment in these institutes be collaborative.
What is a collaborative assessment?
As the moniker goes, collaborative evaluation is the type of evaluation where more than one person or group get together to examine the efficiency and knowledge intake of trainees. Evidently, when more than one mind contributes their perspectives to the evaluation, the grading is more inclusive and extensive. With collaborative assessment, both students and teachers can benefit in their own ways.
How can collaborative assessment take place?
Innovation has actually really removed the physical distance considering human cooperation. People can connect and interact more freely today. The Best School in Haryana makes the most of this aspect of contemporary advancement to help with collective evaluation and successfully assess the development of their students. Within the spheres of possible collaboration, schools can give way for assessment in the following good manners.
More than one teacher can teach and assess a class in Best School in Haryana
Schools with more than one branch have this benefit of allowing a guest teacher to, at times, be available in and teach a topic. Every teacher has their own unique method of delivering a lesson. When students get exposed to more than one faculty, they naturally get a wider scope of learning the topic. And when two instructors can team up to teach a class, they can also work together to examine the students there and grade with a diverse state of mind. One teacher might focus on the subject knowledge of trainees. The other may bring in the ability advancement aspect. In any case, the students will benefit due to the mix of 2 essential components in their assessment.
Teachers can connect over the internet
During an assessment, rather of bearing the responsibility separately, instructors can examine together and work in a group over the internet. And the best part of using technology to evaluate is that the instructor’s boundary of partnership is not limited to one or a few schools. He/she can learn a mentor method from a teacher in another nation and apply that in the class in a collective way with this new mentor.
Trainees can examine each other
This specification closes the loop of collaborative evaluation which makes it so effective. Collaborative evaluation in the sphere of trainees just has dual benefits. Any group activity where the instructor delegates the assessment to the students can lead to collective evaluation.
Hence, evaluation can be a collaborative process
The Alpine Convent School is one such institute where along with learning, evaluation is collective. Collective assessment does away with the drawbacks of the traditional method, as is very much needed. Today, the requirement is of general advancement and only collective assessment can facilitate that.